|
By Laurie Kindel Property owners, landlords, tenants and employers should become familiar with the new Minnesota Citizen's Personal Protection Act of 2003 which became effective on May 28, 2003. Among other things, the law imposes new requirements on owners, landlords, tenants and employers who wish to prohibit firearms on their premises. Following are some of the highlights of the new law. If you have specific questions, please feel free to contact a member of Maslon's real estate or insurance team or your legal advisor. What must a private establishment do to prohibit persons with permits from carrying guns on its premises? What is a "reasonable request" to a person to not bring fire arms into a private establishment? • Posting of Notice First, a conspicuous sign must be prominently posted at every entrance to the establishment containing the following language: (NAME OF FIRM) BANS GUNS IN THESE PREMISES.
To be "conspicuous," a posting must use black letters in arial typeface that are at least 1-1/2 inches in height, set against a bright contrasting background that is at least 187 square inches in area (for example, 11" x 17"). To be "prominent," a posting must be readily visible and within four feet laterally of the entrance, and the bottom of the sign must be at a height of four to six feet above the floor. • Additional Notice Secondly, the establishment or a designated individual must "personally inform" each person entering the establishment of the posted request and demand compliance. What happens if a person with a permit to carry a firearm disregards the reasonable request to not bring firearms into an establishment? What restrictions may be imposed on the possession of firearms in a parking facility or parking area? What may landlords do to restrict people from carrying or possessing firearms on rental property? Employment issues to consider: What are the risks of allowing people to carry concealed weapons onto your business premises? Business owners/operators have an affirmative duty to protect people coming onto the property from both: A) dangers that are known to the owner/operator; and B) dangers that the owner/operator might discover with reasonable care. Some may argue that if a firearm injures someone, a business owner who allowed the gun to be brought onto the premises may be liable for negligence because the owner/operator knew of the potential danger of allowing firearms on the property. On the other hand, some may also argue that a business owner who restricts guns on the premises could be held liable for negligence for preventing a person from defending him or herself. One way to minimize this risk is to draft and implement a policy regarding guns on the premises. If a business has a well-drafted policy that is consistently enforced, this will decrease the likelihood that the business will be held liable for negligence. Things to consider in developing and implementing a policy on concealed weapons are: Does insurance cover the liability created by allowing (or not allowing) firearms on your premises? • Firearms Exclusion • Intentional/expected Acts Exclusion If a person were to sustain bodily injury from a gun, an insurance company might deny the claim if the business permitted guns on the premises. The insurance company would argue that by allowing guns on the premises, the insured acted intentionally or should have expected that someone would be injured.
|
.jpg)